Title |
Esophageal Thermal Injury Following Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.10.014 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sakher Y Sarairah, Brandon Woodbury, Nilubon Methachittiphan, Deanna M Tregoning, Arun R Sridhar, Nazem Akoum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 54% |
Australia | 2 | 8% |
Georgia | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Turkey | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 42% |
Members of the public | 8 | 33% |
Scientists | 6 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 25 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 32% |
Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 25 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,179,716
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#518
of 1,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,692
of 478,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#15
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.