↓ Skip to main content

N-acetylcysteine Plus Deferoxamine Improves Cardiac Function in Wistar Rats After Non-reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
N-acetylcysteine Plus Deferoxamine Improves Cardiac Function in Wistar Rats After Non-reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12265-015-9633-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda Phaelante, Luís Eduardo Rohde, Amanda Lopes, Virgílio Olsen, Santiago Alonso Leitão Tobar, Carolina Cohen, Nidiane Martinelli, Andréia Biolo, Felipe Dal-Pizzol, Nadine Clausell, Michael Andrades

Abstract

The antioxidant N-acetycysteine can turn into a prooxidant molecule in presence of iron ions. Thus, our goal was to test if the association of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and an iron chelator (deferoxamine-DFX) in a rodent model of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) improves cardiac function. Male Wistar rats were subjected to a SHAM surgery or AMI. The animals were randomized: vehicle, NAC (25 mg/kg for 28 days), DFX (40 mg/kg for 7 days), or NAC plus DFX (NAC plus DFX, respectively). Animals were killed 28 days after the AMI. Animals treated with NAC/DFX showed an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction at 28 days when compared with vehicle group (45.2 ± 10.9 % vs. 34.7 ± 8.7 %, p = 0.03). Antioxidant effect of NAC/DFX treatment decreased 4-hydroxynonenal when compared to AMI group (p = 0.06). In conclusion, we showed beneficial effect of NAC/DFX association in improving left ventricle function in an experimental AMI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 19%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,236,328
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#197
of 577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,126
of 264,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.