You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SMO-M2 mutation does not support cell-autonomous Hedgehog activity in cerebellar granule cell precursors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-56057-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marialaura Petroni, Maria Sahùn Roncero, Valentina Ramponi, Francesca Fabretti, Vittoria Nicolis Di Robilant, Marta Moretti, Vincenzo Alfano, Alessandro Corsi, Simone De Panfilis, Maria Giubettini, Stefano Di Giulio, Carlo Capalbo, Francesca Belardinilli, Anna Coppa, Francesca Sardina, Valeria Colicchia, Flaminia Pedretti, Paola Infante, Beatrice Cardinali, Alessandra Tessitore, Gianluca Canettieri, Enrico De Smaele, Giuseppe Giannini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 20% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2019.
All research outputs
#18,042,790
of 23,184,056 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#88,655
of 125,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,769
of 457,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3,048
of 4,350 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,184,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,350 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.