You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic Factors Influencing Warfarin Dose in Black‐African Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/cpt.1755 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Innocent G. Asiimwe, Eunice J. Zhang, Rostam Osanlou, Amanda Krause, Chrisly Dillon, Guilherme Suarez‐Kurtz, Honghong Zhang, Jamila A. Perini, Jessicca Y. Renta, Jorge Duconge, Larisa H. Cavallari, Leiliane R. Marcatto, Mark T. Beasly, Minoli A. Perera, Nita A. Limdi, Paulo C.J.L. Santos, Stephen E. Kimmel, Steven A. Lubitz, Stuart A. Scott, Vivian K. Kawai, Andrea L. Jorgensen, Munir Pirmohamed |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,662,002
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#740
of 4,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,466
of 452,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#13
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.