↓ Skip to main content

The aging disc: using an ovine model to examine age-related differences in the biomechanical properties of the intralamellar matrix of single lamellae

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
The aging disc: using an ovine model to examine age-related differences in the biomechanical properties of the intralamellar matrix of single lamellae
Published in
European Spine Journal, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00586-016-4603-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle M. Stewart, Lauren A. Monaco, Diane E. Gregory

Abstract

To determine the effect of age on the biomechanical properties of the intralamellar matrix of single annulus fibrosus (AF) lamellae. One intervertebral disc (IVD) was excised from five young (<12 months), five middle-aged (2-4 years) and five older (5-7 years) ovine lumbar spines. From each IVD, a maximum of four single AF lamellae samples were harvested: two from the anterior region and two from the posterior region. Tissues were mounted in a tensile testing apparatus such that tension was applied perpendicular to the orientation of the collagen fibers to isolate the intralamellar matrix. Variables of interest from the stress-strain relationship were: end of toe-region strain and corresponding stress, initial failure stress and strain, and elastic stiffness. When compared to the middle-aged and old samples, the intralamellar matrix of young AF samples displayed significantly higher stress values at the end of the end of toe-region (p = 0.008) and at initial failure (p = 0.002). Further, the young samples were stiffer than both middle-aged and old samples (p = 0.04). This study was the first to show that the intralamellar matrix of single AF lamellae is weaker and more compliant in middle-aged and old ovine IVDs compared to young IVDs. These findings are likely a result of the remarkable age-related changes that occur that ultimately weaken the IVD as a whole.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 22%
Other 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Engineering 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Unspecified 2 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,325,615
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#3,650
of 4,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,224
of 304,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#51
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,645 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.