↓ Skip to main content

インストラクショナルデザイン ―学びの「効果・効率・魅力」の向上を目指した技法―

Overview of attention for article published in IEICE Communications Society Magazine, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
インストラクショナルデザイン ―学びの「効果・効率・魅力」の向上を目指した技法―
Published in
IEICE Communications Society Magazine, September 2019
DOI 10.1587/bplus.13.110
Authors

鈴木 克明

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 43%
Other 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 43%
Arts and Humanities 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2019.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from IEICE Communications Society Magazine
#79
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,190
of 350,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEICE Communications Society Magazine
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.