Title |
Rescuing Informed Consent: How the new “Key Information” and “Reasonable Person” Provisions in the Revised U.S. Common Rule open the door to long Overdue Informed Consent Disclosure Improvements and why we need to walk Through that door
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science and Engineering Ethics, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11948-019-00170-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mark Yarborough |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 21% |
United States | 2 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
France | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 6 | 43% |
Members of the public | 5 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 27% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 33% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
Psychology | 1 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,452,874
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#196
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,749
of 480,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.