| Title |
Trends in mortality by labour market position around retirement ages in three European countries with different welfare regimes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00038-012-0359-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seeromanie Harding, Erik Lenguerrand, Giuseppe Costa, Angelo d’Errico, Pekka Martikainen, Lasse Tarkiainen, David Blane, Bola Akinwale, Melanie Bartley |
| Abstract |
In the face of economic downturn and increasing life expectancy, many industrial nations are adopting a policy of postponing the retirement age. However, questions still remain around the consequence of working longer into old age. We examine mortality by work status around retirement ages in countries with different welfare regimes; Finland (social democratic), Turin (Italy; conservative), and England and Wales (liberal). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 2 | 20% |
| France | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 17% |
| Psychology | 5 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,803,048
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#561
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,823
of 175,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.