↓ Skip to main content

Parents’ Disclosure of Their HIV Infection to Their Children in the Context of the Family

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Parents’ Disclosure of Their HIV Infection to Their Children in the Context of the Family
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10461-010-9715-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

David P. Kennedy, Burton O. Cowgill, Laura M. Bogart, Rosalie Corona, Gery W. Ryan, Debra A. Murphy, Theresa Nguyen, Mark A. Schuster

Abstract

We interviewed 33 HIV-infected parents from the HIV Cost and Services Utilization Study (HCSUS), 27 of their minor children, 19 adult children, and 15 caregivers about the process of children learning that their parents were HIV positive. We summarize the retrospective descriptions of parents' disclosure of their HIV status to their children, from the perspective of multiple family members. We analyzed transcripts of these interviews with systematic qualitative methods. Both parents and children reported unplanned disclosure experiences with positive and negative outcomes. Parents sometimes reported that disclosure was not as negative as they feared. However, within-household analysis showed disagreement between parents and children from the same household regarding disclosure outcomes. These findings suggest that disclosure should be addressed within a family context to facilitate communication and children's coping. Parents should consider negative and positive outcomes, unplanned disclosure and children's capacity to adapt after disclosure when deciding whether to disclose.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor 5 6%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 20%
Psychology 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,228,458
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#1,208
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,916
of 97,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.