You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
UAV‐derived estimates of forest structure to inform ponderosa pine forest restoration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/rse2.137 |
| Authors |
Adam Belmonte, Temuulen Sankey, Joel A. Biederman, John Bradford, Scott J. Goetz, Thomas Kolb, Travis Woolley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 42% |
| Argentina | 2 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Norway | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,356,758
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
#200
of 322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,333
of 474,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.