| Title |
Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0889-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Allison Tong, Anneliese Synnot, Sally Crowe, Sophie Hill, Andrea Matus, Nicole Scholes-Robertson, Sandy Oliver, Katherine Cowan, Mona Nasser, Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Talia Gutman, Amanda Baumgart, Jonathan C. Craig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 126 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 36 | 29% |
| Canada | 9 | 7% |
| Australia | 9 | 7% |
| United States | 8 | 6% |
| Ireland | 5 | 4% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 40 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 70 | 56% |
| Scientists | 35 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 44 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 18% |
| Unknown | 49 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2022.
All research outputs
#557,694
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#42
of 2,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,598
of 480,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.