You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Development of a Mouse-Adapted MERS Coronavirus
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 13 |
| Book title |
MERS Coronavirus
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-0211-9_13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-160210-2, 978-1-07-160211-9
|
| Authors |
Kun Li, Paul B. McCray, Li, Kun, McCray, Paul B., Paul B. McCray, Jr. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Librarian | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2021.
All research outputs
#13,662,605
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,637
of 13,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,110
of 460,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#29
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.