↓ Skip to main content

Hybrid Complex Polarization Propagator/Molecular Mechanics Method for Heterogeneous Environments

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hybrid Complex Polarization Propagator/Molecular Mechanics Method for Heterogeneous Environments
Published in
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, May 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zilvinas Rinkevicius, Jaime A. R. Sandberg, Xin Li, Mathieu Linares, Patrick Norman, Hans Ågren

Abstract

We introduce a hybrid complex polarization propagator/molecular mechanics method for the calculation of near-resonant and resonant response properties of molecules in heterogeneous environments, which consist of a metallic surface, or nanoparticle, and a solvent. The applicability and performance of the method is demonstrated by computations of linear absorption spectra of para-nitroaniline physisorbed at a gold/dimethylsulfoxide interface in the UV/Vis and near carbon K-edge regions of the spectrum. It is shown that the shift of absorption cross section induced by the heterogeneous environment varies significantly depending on the nature of excited states encountered in the targeted frequency region as well as on the actual size of the resonant frequencies, and that the solvent component of heterogeneous environment is responsible for the major part of environmental shift, especially in the higher frequency range of the carbon K-edge region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 69%
Physics and Astronomy 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,802,399
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
#4,625
of 6,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,308
of 309,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
#71
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,744 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.