↓ Skip to main content

What’s new in ICU volume-outcome relationships?

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
What’s new in ICU volume-outcome relationships?
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00134-013-2992-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy M. Kahn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 21%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 4 29%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 86%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,758,964
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,461
of 4,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,294
of 197,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.