Title |
What’s new in ICU volume-outcome relationships?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-013-2992-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeremy M. Kahn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 21% |
Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 29% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 86% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,758,964
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,461
of 4,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,294
of 197,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.