| Title |
‘Excellence’ and Exclusion: The Individual Costs of Institutional Competitiveness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Minerva, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11024-016-9298-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard Watermeyer, Mark Olssen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| Greece | 1 | 7% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 21% |
| Unknown | 24 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 46 | 39% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 18 | 15% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,576,682
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Minerva
#30
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,456
of 313,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minerva
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.