↓ Skip to main content

Gastric Bypass Does Not Influence Olfactory Function in Obese Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Gastric Bypass Does Not Influence Olfactory Function in Obese Patients
Published in
Obesity Surgery, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11695-011-0487-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brynn E. Richardson, Eric A. Vanderwoude, Ranjan Sudan, Donald A. Leopold, Jon S. Thompson

Abstract

Morbidly obese individuals have altered sense of taste and smell. Gastric bypass (GBP) alters taste but olfactory function has not been evaluated. Changes in these senses may influence dietary preferences following GBP. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of abdominal operation, specifically GBP, and weight loss on olfactory function. Fifty-five persons undergoing GBP and cholecystectomy and 40 persons undergoing cholecystectomy (CC) alone were administered the Cross Cultural Smell Identification Test (CC-SIT) preoperatively and 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Patients undergoing GBP underwent further tests at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Body mass index (BMI) was also assessed. Mean BMI was significantly greater preoperatively in the GBP group (50.6 ± 8.0 vs. 30.6 ± 7.3 kg/m(2), p < 0.05). Significantly more GBP patients had abnormal CC-SIT results preoperatively (12.7% vs. 5.0%). There were no significant differences in percentage of abnormal tests at 2 and 6 weeks within groups but remained lower in CC patients (2 weeks, GBP 6.2% vs. CC 5.7%; 6 weeks, GBP 9.8% vs. CC 3.2%, p < .05). BMI decreased in the GBP group at 12 months (50.6 ± 8.0 preoperatively to 31.9 ± 6.9 p < 0.05). Absolute olfactory dysfunction (AOD) was present at each interval up to 12 months after GBP. Only 22% of patients with AOD remained obese. GBP does not appear to influence olfactory function. AOD present in morbidly obese persons is not affected by weight loss. These findings support that olfactory dysfunction may be a contributing factor to the development of obesity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 25%
Psychology 7 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 23 37%