↓ Skip to main content

Silica, asbestos, man-made mineral fibers, and cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, May 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Silica, asbestos, man-made mineral fibers, and cancer
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, May 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1018469607938
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyle Steenland, Leslie Stayner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 27%
Environmental Science 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Engineering 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#1,698
of 2,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,280
of 29,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.