You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
血清シスタチンC値及び酵素法により測定した血清クレアチニン値を用いた各腎機能推算式の相関性と差異を生じる要因の解析
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Yakugaku Zasshi = Journal of Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1248/yakushi.18-00225 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Makoto Takahashi, Sintarou Takayama, Hideyuki Suga, Shota Kadomura, Masakazu Kojima, Kazunari Iwao, Kiyotaka Takeda, Hideki Sato, Michiya Kobayashi, Hiroshi Saitoh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 44% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,728,069
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Yakugaku Zasshi = Journal of Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
#321
of 1,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,347
of 480,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Yakugaku Zasshi = Journal of Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,969 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.