| Title |
Increasing US health plan coverage for exercise programming in community mental health settings for people with serious mental illness: a position statement from the Society of Behavior Medicine and the American College of Sports Medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Translational Behavioral Medicine, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13142-016-0407-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah I. Pratt, Gerald J. Jerome, Kristin L. Schneider, Lynette L. Craft, Matthew P. Buman, Mark Stoutenberg, Gail L. Daumit, Stephen J. Bartels, David E. Goodrich |
| Abstract |
Adults with serious mental illness die more than 10 years earlier than the average American. Premature mortality is due to the high prevalence of preventable diseases including cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Poor lifestyle behaviors including lack of exercise and physical inactivity contribute to the epidemic levels of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease observed among adults with serious mental illness. Not surprisingly, people with serious mental illness are among the most costly consumers of health services due to increased visits for poorly managed mental and physical health. Recent studies have demonstrated that exercise interventions based on community mental health settings can significantly improve physical and mental health in people with serious mental illness. However, current funding regulations limit the ability of community mental health settings to offer exercise programming services to people with serious mental illness. Policy efforts are needed to improve the dissemination and sustainability of exercise programs for people with serious mental illness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 52% |
| Scientists | 9 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 154 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 33 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 34 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 12% |
| Psychology | 13 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 48 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2016.
All research outputs
#2,199,348
of 23,588,018 outputs
Outputs from Translational Behavioral Medicine
#132
of 1,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,544
of 300,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,588,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.