↓ Skip to main content

Environmental factors and cancer incidence and mortality in different countries, with special reference to dietary practices

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Cancer, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
patent
6 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
1968 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Environmental factors and cancer incidence and mortality in different countries, with special reference to dietary practices
Published in
International Journal of Cancer, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/ijc.2910150411
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce Armstrong, Richard Doll

Abstract

Incidence rates for 27 cancers in 23 countries and mortality rates for 14 cancers in 32 countries have been correlated with a wide range of dietary and other variables. Dietary variables were strongly correlated with several types of cancer, particularly meat consumption with cancer of the colon and fat consumption with cancers of the breast and corpus uteri. The data suggest a possible role for dietary factors in modifying the development of cancer at a number of other sites. The usefulness and limitations of the method are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 279 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 14%
Student > Bachelor 41 14%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Other 17 6%
Other 62 21%
Unknown 77 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 5%
Environmental Science 6 2%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 89 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#846,361
of 24,799,506 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#265
of 12,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,210
of 78,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#5
of 1,603 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,799,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,603 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.