↓ Skip to main content

Does moving up a food chain increase aggregation in parasites?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Royal Society Interface, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does moving up a food chain increase aggregation in parasites?
Published in
Journal of The Royal Society Interface, May 2016
DOI 10.1098/rsif.2016.0102
Pubmed ID
Authors

R J G Lester, R McVinish

Abstract

General laws in ecological parasitology are scarce. Here, we evaluate data on numbers of fish parasites published by over 200 authors to determine whether acquiring parasites via prey is associated with an increase in parasite aggregation. Parasite species were grouped taxonomically to produce 20 or more data points per group as far as possible. Most parasites that remained at one trophic level were less aggregated than those that had passed up a food chain. We use a stochastic model to show that high parasite aggregation in predators can be solely the result of the accumulation of parasites in their prey. The model is further developed to show that a change in the predators feeding behaviour with age may further increase parasite aggregation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 40%
Environmental Science 5 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,236,328
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#1,748
of 3,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,539
of 298,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#32
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.