| Title |
Explanations for Unsuccessful Weight Loss Among Bariatric Surgery Candidates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Obesity Surgery, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11695-008-9573-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin O. Hwang, Joseph H. Childs, G. Ken Goodrick, Wael A. Aboughali, Eric J. Thomas, Craig W. Johnson, Sherman C. Yu, Elmer V. Bernstam |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 26% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 25% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 14% |
| Psychology | 10 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2016.
All research outputs
#18,456,836
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#2,539
of 3,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,604
of 82,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#30
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.