↓ Skip to main content

Life-threatening hemorrhagic shock after laparoscopic surgery: a case of postoperative thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Anesthesia, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Life-threatening hemorrhagic shock after laparoscopic surgery: a case of postoperative thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00540-012-1392-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satoru Asano, Masuzoh Taneda, Keiichi Katoh, Kenshi Suzuki

Abstract

We report the successful management of a female patient who developed postoperative thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) after an uneventful laparoscopic oophorocystectomy. The patient underwent uneventful laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cystoma. One hour after completion of surgery, the patient suddenly went into shock, with her blood pressure dropping to 60/40 mmHg. Hemorrhage into the abdominal cavity with an estimated blood loss of 2,000 ml was confirmed by exploratory laparotomy. Initially, anemia and thrombocytopenia were attributed to blood consumption or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). However, blood tests revealed evidence of hemolytic anemia, with fragmented erythrocytes observed on peripheral blood smear examination. Serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine were elevated. Based on the findings, postoperative TTP was suspected. High-dose steroids and plasma infusions were administered but proved ineffective. Plasma exchange was performed three times, resulting in resolution of postoperative TTP. TTP is an idiopathic disorder, known to be triggered by surgical trauma. Postoperative TTP is difficult to distinguish clinically from DIC because of its close similarity with the latter and subtle differences from other postoperative hematological complications. It is important to bear in mind the possibility of postoperative TTP in patients with unexplained hemorrhagic shock after uneventful surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2012.
All research outputs
#19,409,375
of 23,878,777 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#618
of 852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,722
of 165,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,878,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 852 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.