| Title |
Effects of Fruit Extracts on Pancreatic Lipase Activity in Lipid Emulsions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11130-015-0501-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dorota Sosnowska, Anna Podsędek, Małgorzata Redzynia, Dorota Żyżelewicz |
| Abstract |
Pancreatic lipase is the most important enzyme in digestion of triglycerides. Reduction of energy intake from dietary fat through inhibition of this enzyme may be a strategy to prevent and treat obesity. In this study, the effect of 31 fruit extracts on pancreatic lipase was investigated using triolein, sunflower oil and rapeseed oil emulsions. Surprisingly, about 30 % of the fruits tested stimulated pancreatic lipase activity in oil emulsions by over 50 %. Only six fruit extracts were found to inhibit pancreatic lipase activity with the IC50 value varying from 21.11 to 266.48 mg of fruit equivalent/ml of emulsion. Among them, chokeberry demonstrated the highest anti-lipase activity. The inhibitory activity ranks were comparable in all lipid emulsion models and suggest that consumption of chokeberry, red gooseberry and red currant fruits may be a new dietary option for reduction of fat absorption via inhibition of pancreatic lipase. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 33% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,340,365
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#106
of 714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,147
of 265,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.