↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Usefulness of Population Pharmacokinetics Analysis Results to Community Pharmacy

Overview of attention for article published in Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences), January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of Usefulness of Population Pharmacokinetics Analysis Results to Community Pharmacy
Published in
Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences), January 2006
DOI 10.5649/jjphcs.32.940
Authors

Hiroki Sato, Toru Maruyama, Yoko Otagiri, Emiko Mimura, Keiko Kawakami, Rinko Ikeda, Yoshiro Okayama, Makoto Anraku, Masaki Otagiri

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences)
#179
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,185
of 174,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Iryo Yakugaku (Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences)
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.