You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
指揮基本動作における初心者と熟達者の動作タイミングの違いに関する分析的研究
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF MUSIC EDUCATION RESEARCH, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.20614/jjomer.34.2_1 |
| Authors |
新山王 政和 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,852,306
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JAPANESE JOURNAL OF MUSIC EDUCATION RESEARCH
#2
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,107
of 327,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAPANESE JOURNAL OF MUSIC EDUCATION RESEARCH
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.