Title |
Barrett’s Esophagus: A Review of the Literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11605-011-1485-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Erin W. Gilbert, Renato A. Luna, Vincent L. Harrison, John G. Hunter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 11 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Researcher | 5 | 9% |
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Other | 11 | 20% |
Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 14% |
Engineering | 4 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,329,545
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#94
of 2,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,945
of 120,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.