↓ Skip to main content

農村が育む植物の多様性と保全

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF RURAL PLANNING ASSOCIATION, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
農村が育む植物の多様性と保全
Published in
JOURNAL OF RURAL PLANNING ASSOCIATION, January 2017
DOI 10.2750/arp.35.469
Authors

楠本 良延, 稲垣 栄洋, 嶺田 拓也, 山本 勝利

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,307,806
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF RURAL PLANNING ASSOCIATION
#4
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,238
of 421,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF RURAL PLANNING ASSOCIATION
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them