↓ Skip to main content

Hypoxia and hypoxia signaling in tissue repair and fibrosis.

Overview of attention for chapter
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Hypoxia and hypoxia signaling in tissue repair and fibrosis.
Published in
International review of cell and molecular biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-394307-1.00003-5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-12-394307-1
Authors

Lokmic Z, Musyoka J, Hewitson TD, Darby IA, Lokmic, Zerina, Musyoka, James, Hewitson, Timothy D., Darby, Ian A., Zerina Lokmic, James Musyoka, Timothy D. Hewitson, Ian A. Darby

Abstract

Following injury, vascular damage results in the loss of perfusion and consequent low oxygen tension (hypoxia) which may be exacerbated by a rapid influx of inflammatory and mesenchymal cells with high metabolic demands for oxygen. Changes in systemic and cellular oxygen concentrations induce tightly regulated response pathways that attempt to restore oxygen supply to cells and modulate cell function in hypoxic conditions. Most of these responses occur through the induction of the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) which regulates many processes needed for tissue repair during ischemia in the damaged tissue. HIF-1 transcriptionally upregulates expression of metabolic proteins (GLUT-1), adhesion proteins (integrins), soluble growth factors (TGF-β and VEGF), and extracellular matrix components (type I collagen and fibronectin), which enhance the repair process. For these reasons, HIF-1 is viewed as a positive regulator of wound healing and a potential regulator of organ repair and tissue fibrosis. Understanding the complex role of hypoxia in the loss of function in scarring tissues and biology of chronic wound, and organ repair will aid in the development of pharmaceutical agents that can redress the detrimental outcomes often seen in repair and scarring.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 24%
Student > Master 14 11%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 18%
Engineering 5 4%
Materials Science 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,773
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from International review of cell and molecular biology
#268
of 405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,924
of 244,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International review of cell and molecular biology
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 405 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.