| Title |
Connectivity maintain mammal assemblages functional diversity within agricultural and fragmented landscapes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-016-1017-x |
| Authors |
Marcelo Magioli, Katia Maria Paschoaletto Micchi de Barros Ferraz, Eleonore Zulnara Freire Setz, Alexandre Reis Percequillo, Michelle Viviane de Sá Santos Rondon, Vanessa Villanova Kuhnen, Mariana Cristina da Silva Canhoto, Karen Evelyn Almeida dos Santos, Claudia Zukeran Kanda, Gabriela de Lima Fregonezi, Helena Alves do Prado, Mitra Katherina Ferreira, Milton Cezar Ribeiro, Priscilla Marqui Schmidt Villela, Luiz Lehmann Coutinho, Márcia Gonçalves Rodrigues |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 321 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 13% |
| Researcher | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 9% |
| Other | 48 | 15% |
| Unknown | 72 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 141 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 76 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 83 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,406,971
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#278
of 1,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,813
of 330,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.