↓ Skip to main content

高校生の献血に向けて効果的な献血推進活動とは:高校生を対象とした献血に関する意識調査(第3報)

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Transfusion and Cell Therapy, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
高校生の献血に向けて効果的な献血推進活動とは:高校生を対象とした献血に関する意識調査(第3報)
Published in
Japanese Journal of Transfusion and Cell Therapy, October 2019
DOI 10.3925/jjtc.65.839
Authors

榛葉 隆人, 山田 千亜希, 藤原 晴美, 芝田 大樹, 石塚 恵子, 古牧 宏啓, 渡邊 弘子, 梶原 道子, 浅井 隆善, 岩尾 憲明, 室井 一男, 竹下 明裕

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,899,719
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Transfusion and Cell Therapy
#1
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,499
of 376,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Transfusion and Cell Therapy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them