↓ Skip to main content

The role of empathy in the neural responses to observed human social touch

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
The role of empathy in the neural responses to observed human social touch
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, May 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13415-016-0432-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leehe Peled-Avron, Einat Levy-Gigi, Gal Richter-Levin, Nachshon Korem, Simone G. Shamay-Tsoory

Abstract

One of the ways in which individuals convey feelings and thoughts to one another is through touch. Although the neural responses to felt and observed tactile stimuli between an inanimate object and a part of the human body have been vastly explored, the neural responses to observed human interaction involving touch are not well understood. Considering that the observation of social touch involves vicarious sharing of emotions, we hypothesized that levels of empathic traits modulate the neural responses to observed touch and focused on the attenuation in the mu\alpha rhythm (8-13Hz), a neural marker that has been related to sensorimotor resonance. Fifty-four participants observed photos depicting social touch, nonsocial touch, or no touch while their electroencephalography (EEG) activity was recorded. Results showed that interindividual differences in levels of empathic traits modulated both behavioral and electrophysiological responses to human social touch, such that highly empathic participants evaluated human social touch as inducing more pleasant emotions and exhibited greater mu suppression upon observation of human social touch compared to less empathic participants. Specifically, both the behavioral and the electrophysiological responses to observed social touch were predicted by levels of personal distress, a measure of emotional contagion. These findings indicate that the behavioral and electrophysiological responses to observed social touch are modulated by levels of empathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 25%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 32%
Neuroscience 21 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 30 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,804,975
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#130
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,265
of 308,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.