| Title |
Vanadium metabolism investigation using substance flow and scenario analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11783-013-0585-1 |
| Authors |
Fangfang Zhang, Huiquan Li, Bo Chen, Xue Guan, Yi Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 11% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 26% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,099,164
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering
#19
of 211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,793
of 212,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them