↓ Skip to main content

葛西臨海公園の護岸におけるウラギク(Aster tripolium L.)の 分布規定要因の検討

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 125)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
葛西臨海公園の護岸におけるウラギク(Aster tripolium L.)の 分布規定要因の検討
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, May 2019
DOI 10.7211/jjsrt.45.196
Authors

三島 らすな, GARDINER Tim, 倉本 宣

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#6,485,808
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology
#17
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,576
of 363,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.