↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Trends in U.S. Ambulatory Cardiovascular Care 2013 to 2017 JACC Review Topic of the Week

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Trends in U.S. Ambulatory Cardiovascular Care 2013 to 2017 JACC Review Topic of the Week
Published in
JACC, January 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas M. Maddox, Yang Song, Joseph Allen, Paul S. Chan, Adeela Khan, Jane J. Lee, Joshua Mitchell, William J. Oetgen, Angelo Ponirakis, Claire Segawa, John A. Spertus, Fran Thorpe, Salim S. Virani, Frederick A. Masoudi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,133,797
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,764
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,575
of 473,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#52
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.