| Title |
Factors Affecting Influential Discussions Among Physicians: A Social Network Analysis of a Primary Care Practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-007-0190-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nancy L. Keating, John Z. Ayanian, Paul D. Cleary, Peter V. Marsden |
| Abstract |
Physicians often rely on colleagues for new information and advice about the care of their patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 26% |
| Researcher | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 22% |
| Unknown | 19 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 21% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 23 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,839,426
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,991
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,654
of 78,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#23
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.