↓ Skip to main content

A National Study of the Prevalence and Correlates of Domestic Violence Among Women in India

Overview of attention for article published in Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A National Study of the Prevalence and Correlates of Domestic Violence Among Women in India
Published in
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, November 2010
DOI 10.1177/1010539510384499
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koustuv Dalal, Kent Lindqvist

Abstract

This article estimates the national prevalence rate of domestic violence in India and examines the demographic and socioeconomic status of the victims of domestic violence. The study used the Indian National Family Health Survey 3, a cross-sectional national survey of 124 385 ever-married women of reproductive age from all the 29 member states. χ(2) Analysis and logistic regression were used. Lifetime experiences of violence among respondents were as follows: emotional violence, 14%; less severe physical violence, 31%; severe physical violence, 10%; and sexual violence, 8%. Women of scheduled castes and Muslim religion were most often exposed to domestic violence. Women's poorer economic background, working status, and husband's controlling behavior emerged as strong predictors for domestic violence in India. Elimination of structural inequalities inherent in the indigenous oppressive institutions of religion, caste, and the traditional male hierarchy in society could prevent domestic violence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 170 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 20%
Student > Master 17 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 39 23%
Unknown 40 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 38 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 14%
Psychology 25 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 44 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,161,011
of 23,685,936 outputs
Outputs from Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
#127
of 744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,139
of 183,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,685,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 744 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.