↓ Skip to main content

Addressing challenges for future strategic‐level emergency management: reframing, networking, and capacity‐building

Overview of attention for article published in Disasters, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Addressing challenges for future strategic‐level emergency management: reframing, networking, and capacity‐building
Published in
Disasters, May 2016
DOI 10.1111/disa.12196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karyn Bosomworth, Christine Owen, Steven Curnin

Abstract

The mounting frequency and intensity of natural hazards, alongside growing interdependencies between social-technical and ecological systems, are placing increased pressure on emergency management. This is particularly true at the strategic level of emergency management, which involves planning for and managing non-routine, high-consequence events. Drawing on the literature, a survey, and interviews and workshops with Australia's senior emergency managers, this paper presents an analysis of five core challenges that these pressures are creating for strategic-level emergency management. It argues that emphasising 'emergency management' as a primary adaptation strategy is a retrograde step that ignores the importance of addressing socio-political drivers of vulnerabilities. Three key suggestions are presented that could assist the country's strategic-level emergency management in tackling these challenges: (i) reframe emergency management as a component of disaster risk reduction rather than them being one and the same; (ii) adopt a network governance approach; and (iii) further develop the capacities of strategic-level emergency managers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Lecturer 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 19%
Engineering 10 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 28 31%