You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of an Electronic Partogram: A Mixed-Method, Quasi-Experimental Study Among Skilled Birth Attendants in Kenya
|
---|---|
Published in |
Global Health : Science and Practice Journal, December 2019
|
DOI | 10.9745/ghsp-d-19-00195 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Harshadkumar Sanghvi, Diwakar Mohan, Lindsay Litwin, Eva Bazant, Patricia Gomez, Tara MacDowell, Levis Onsase, Valentino Wabwile, Charles Waka, Zahida Qureshi, Eunice Omanga, Anthony Gichangi, Ruth Muia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Kenya | 2 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
Lecturer | 7 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 15% |
Unknown | 55 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 11% |
Unknown | 56 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,270,860
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Global Health : Science and Practice Journal
#529
of 888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,275
of 475,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Health : Science and Practice Journal
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.