↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of an Electronic Partogram: A Mixed-Method, Quasi-Experimental Study Among Skilled Birth Attendants in Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in Global Health : Science and Practice Journal, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of an Electronic Partogram: A Mixed-Method, Quasi-Experimental Study Among Skilled Birth Attendants in Kenya
Published in
Global Health : Science and Practice Journal, December 2019
DOI 10.9745/ghsp-d-19-00195
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harshadkumar Sanghvi, Diwakar Mohan, Lindsay Litwin, Eva Bazant, Patricia Gomez, Tara MacDowell, Levis Onsase, Valentino Wabwile, Charles Waka, Zahida Qureshi, Eunice Omanga, Anthony Gichangi, Ruth Muia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 134 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 7%
Lecturer 7 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 55 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 14%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 56 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,270,860
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Global Health : Science and Practice Journal
#529
of 888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,275
of 475,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Health : Science and Practice Journal
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.