↓ Skip to main content

Weak Organic Ligands Enhance Zinc Uptake in Marine Phytoplankton

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Weak Organic Ligands Enhance Zinc Uptake in Marine Phytoplankton
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, April 2012
DOI 10.1021/es300335u
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ludmilla Aristilde, Yan Xu, François M. M. Morel

Abstract

A recent study of the effect of pH on Zn and Cd bioavailability shows that binding to weak organic ligands can increase the pool of metals available to phytoplankton in the presence of strong chelating agents. We explore the underlying mechanism in laboratory experiments with the model species Emiliania huxleyi and Thalassiosira weissflogii. Additions of L- and D- isomers of cysteine (Cys) result in similar increases in Zn uptake rates in the presence of the strong chelator ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) but decrease it in the absence of EDTA, ruling out uptake by a specific Zn-Cys transporter. The effect of Cys does not result from alleviating diffusion limitation of inorganic Zn. The enhancement of Zn uptake kinetics by weak ligands is consistent with a mechanism involving formation of a transient ternary complex with uptake molecules: (1) the enhancement is most dramatic in Zn limited cells whose high affinity transporters should be most effective at extracting Zn from weak ligands; (2) the enhancement occurs with a variety of weak ligands, demonstrating that the underlying mechanism has little chemical specificity; and (3) no enhancement of uptake is seen when Zn is bound in complexes that would make formation of multiligand complexes with uptake molecules difficult. Weak complexing agents which have received heretofore little attention may play a key role in the bioavailability of metals in natural waters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Greece 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Bulgaria 1 1%
Hong Kong 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 78 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 23%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 9 10%
Professor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 20%
Chemistry 14 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Engineering 5 6%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#16,830
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,117
of 175,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#144
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.