↓ Skip to main content

Economic power of the politically powerless in the 2019 Hong Kong pro-democracy movement

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Asian Studies, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic power of the politically powerless in the 2019 Hong Kong pro-democracy movement
Published in
Critical Asian Studies, January 2020
DOI 10.1080/14672715.2019.1708019
Authors

Debby Sze Wan Chan, Ngai Pun

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor 2 5%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 17 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 37%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Philosophy 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,667,531
of 24,597,084 outputs
Outputs from Critical Asian Studies
#244
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,528
of 467,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Asian Studies
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,597,084 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.