You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-019-0690-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah E. Brnich, Ahmad N. Abou Tayoun, Fergus J. Couch, Garry R. Cutting, Marc S. Greenblatt, Christopher D. Heinen, Dona M. Kanavy, Xi Luo, Shannon M. McNulty, Lea M. Starita, Sean V. Tavtigian, Matt W. Wright, Steven M. Harrison, Leslie G. Biesecker, Jonathan S. Berg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 256 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 13% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 88 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 89 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 96 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,486,648
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#758
of 1,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,308
of 481,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#21
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.