↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of double-coated probiotics for irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized double-blind controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastroenterology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 1,090)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of double-coated probiotics for irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized double-blind controlled trial
Published in
Journal of Gastroenterology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00535-016-1224-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kyungsun Han, Jinghwa Wang, Jae-Gu Seo, Hojun Kim

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the effects of a dual-coated probiotic supplement (Duolac Care) on symptoms of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Fifty subjects with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome were randomly assigned to either the non-coating group or the dual-coating group in order to receive two capsules per day of multi-species probiotics containing 5 billion bacteria per capsule for 4 weeks. Data from an adequate relief questionnaire were used in assessment of primary outcome. Daily records of stool frequencies and the Bristol stool scale, a weekly symptom diary using 100-mm visual analog scale, and Beck depression inventories were collected. Blood tests including blood cell counts, interleukin-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and inducible nitric oxide synthase, and regulatory T cells-CD4 + CD25(high) T cells, CD4 + LAP + T cells and CD25(high) + LAP + T cells-were analyzed before and after the study. The shift of gut microbiota was investigated using a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay. Responses to the adequate relief questionnaire indicated significant improvement in overall discomfort in the dual-coating group and the ratio of normal stools to hard or watery stools had a better effect from dual-coated probiotics compared to non-coated probiotics. This may be due to a shift of intestinal microbiota, as our correlation analysis showed significant negative correlation between Bifidobacterium and urgency of defecation. Our result implies that dual-coating layers of probiotic supplement can be a candidate for treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 229 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 22%
Student > Master 34 15%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Unspecified 11 5%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 65 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Unspecified 11 5%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 71 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#733,054
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastroenterology
#15
of 1,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,742
of 312,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastroenterology
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.