↓ Skip to main content

Effect of M1–M2 Polarization on the Motility and Traction Stresses of Primary Human Macrophages

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Effect of M1–M2 Polarization on the Motility and Traction Stresses of Primary Human Macrophages
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12195-016-0435-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurel E. Hind, Emily B. Lurier, Micah Dembo, Kara L. Spiller, Daniel A. Hammer

Abstract

Macrophages become polarized by cues in their environment and this polarization causes a functional change in their behavior. Two main subsets of polarized macrophages have been described. M1, or "classically activated" macrophages, are pro-inflammatory and M2, or "alternatively activated" macrophages, are anti-inflammatory. In this study, we investigated the motility and force generation of primary human macrophages polarized down the M1 and M2 pathways using chemokinesis assays and traction force microscopy on polyacrylamide gels. We found that M1 macrophages are significantly less motile and M2 macrophages are significantly more motile than unactivated M0 macrophages. We also showed that M1 macrophages generate significantly less force than M0 or M2 macrophages. We further found that M0 and M2, but not M1, macrophage force generation is dependent on ROCK signaling, as identified using the chemical inhibitor Y27632. Finally, using the chemical inhibitor blebbistatin, we found that myosin contraction is required for force generation by M0, M1, and M2 macrophages. This study represents the first investigation of the changes in the mechanical motility mechanisms used by macrophages after polarization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 28%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 23 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 29 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#5,901,975
of 22,869,263 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
#95
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,241
of 299,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,869,263 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.