| Title |
Metallic muscles and beyond: nanofoams at work
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-015-9317-1 |
| Authors |
Eric Detsi, Sarah H. Tolbert, S. Punzhin, Jeff Th. M. De Hosson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 19 | 34% |
| Engineering | 11 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2017.
All research outputs
#20,743,007
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#4,529
of 4,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,000
of 265,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#27
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,672 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.