↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of a candidate reference method for serum cortisol by isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry combined with dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Development and validation of a candidate reference method for serum cortisol by isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry combined with dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, January 2020
DOI 10.1007/s00216-019-02356-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tianjiao Zhang, Haijian Zhao, Miao Li, Jie Zeng, Jing Wang, Qichen Long, Yufei Wang, Chuanbao Zhang, Wenxiang Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 44%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Psychology 1 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Sports and Recreations 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2020.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#6,609
of 9,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#356,600
of 473,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#145
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.