↓ Skip to main content

Challenges for diagnosis and control of cystic hydatid disease

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Tropica, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenges for diagnosis and control of cystic hydatid disease
Published in
Acta Tropica, March 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.02.066
Pubmed ID
Authors

T.S. Barnes, P. Deplazes, B. Gottstein, D.J. Jenkins, A. Mathis, M. Siles-Lucas, P.R. Torgerson, I. Ziadinov, D.D. Heath

Abstract

This paper is based on the experience of the authors, with the aim to define the challenges for Echinococcus granulosus (E.g./CE) diagnosis and control for those countries that may now or in the future be contemplating control of hydatid disease. A variety of methods are available for diagnosis in humans but a universal gold standard is lacking. Diagnosis in definitive hosts can avoid necropsy by the use of methods such as coproantigen detection but test performance is variable between populations. A sylvatic cycle adds challenges in some countries and the epidemiology of the parasite in these hosts is poorly understood. Control by solely administering praziquantel to dogs is not effective in developing countries where the disease is endemic. Additional avenues to pursue include the instigation of participatory planning, use of an existing vaccination for intermediate hosts and development of a vaccine and long-acting anthelmitic implants for definitive hosts. Promoting public acceptance of control of the dog population by humane euthanasia and reduced reproduction is also essential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Unknown 120 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 9 7%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 16 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 27 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,765,020
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Acta Tropica
#301
of 3,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,307
of 168,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Tropica
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.