You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the impact of post-trial implementation of RHIVA nurse-led HIV screening on HIV testing, diagnosis and earlier diagnosis in general practice in London, UK
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
eClinicalMedicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.11.022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Werner Leber, Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths, Peter Martin, Stephen Morris, Estela Capelas Barbosa, Claudia Estcourt, Jane Hutchinson, Maryam Shahmanesh, Farah El-Shogri, Kambiz Boomla, Valerie Delpech, Sarah Creighton, Jane Anderson, Jose Figueroa, Chris Griffiths |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 56% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 21% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 21% |
| Psychology | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,493,595
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from eClinicalMedicine
#699
of 2,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,331
of 473,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eClinicalMedicine
#14
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 82.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.