↓ Skip to main content

最絶滅危惧チョウ類の保護増殖と地域農林業との共存共益の探索 ―日本鱗翅学会自然保護委員会―

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Report of Pro Natura Foundation Japan, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
最絶滅危惧チョウ類の保護増殖と地域農林業との共存共益の探索 ―日本鱗翅学会自然保護委員会―
Published in
Annual Report of Pro Natura Foundation Japan, January 2020
DOI 10.32215/pronatura.28.0_233
Authors

矢後 勝也, 平井 規央, 小沢 英之, 佐々木 公隆, 谷尾 崇, 伊藤 勇人, 遠藤 秀紀, 中村 康弘, 永幡 嘉之, 水落 渚, 関根 雅史, 神宮 周作, 久壽米木 大五郎, 伊藤 雅男, 清水 聡司, 川口 誠, 境 良朗, 山本 以智人, 松木 崇司

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,051,839
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Annual Report of Pro Natura Foundation Japan
#7
of 24 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,089
of 473,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Report of Pro Natura Foundation Japan
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one scored the same or higher as 17 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.