| Title |
Can Patient–Provider Interpersonal Interventions Achieve the Quadruple Aim of Healthcare? A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-019-05525-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie C. Haverfield, Aaron Tierney, Rachel Schwartz, Michelle B. Bass, Cati Brown-Johnson, Dani L. Zionts, Nadia Safaeinili, Meredith Fischer, Jonathan G. Shaw, Sonoo Thadaney, Gabriella Piccininni, Karl A. Lorenz, Steven M. Asch, Abraham Verghese, Donna M. Zulman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 36% |
| Germany | 3 | 8% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 67% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 44 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,696,589
of 25,014,758 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,312
of 8,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,392
of 470,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#37
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,014,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.